Turns out to be something else: A genuine investigative documentary strugglingįor attention against a shadow public relations campaign.ĭocumentaries begins in May 2017, in the immediate aftermath of the Fyreįestival disaster. And what appeared to be a story of competing films Though his editing authority was later “superseded by the distributionĪgreement where the final cut was with the director,” according to Netflix, theĬompany’s reputation. Performing fellatio on a customs official to extract a detained shipment ofĬEO of FuckJerry, Mick Purzycki, who was a producer of Fyre, also claimed to have “final cut” over the documentary while Mysteriously quiet on that issue, instead highlighting eye-poppingly nefariousĪnecdotes, like event producer Andy King’s claim that he came very close to Is trying to rebrand as Jerry Media-and its complicity in McFarland’s doomed Hulu’s Fyre Fraud focused on social media marketing agency FuckJerry-which The two movies ended upĬontextualizing their stories quite differently. However, a new source of intrigue has emerged. Way the movie was produced suggests that FuckJerry used the film to McFarland leftīehind a trail of unpaid debts, notably to the residents of Great Exuma itself, Never materialized-instead of champagne and concerts and luxury villas, ticket-holdersĮncountered FEMA tents, empty beaches, and a transportation crisis. Instagram-fueled dream of partying with supermodels in the Bahamas. Tell the “real” story behind the Fyre Festival debacle of 2017, in which theĬharlatan Billy McFarland ripped off customers who had bought into an But in the case of Netflix’s Fyre, the grift may have seeped into the Presided over by the occupant of the White House. Seem to channel the spirit of the times, bedeviled by grifters and cheats, all Is Fyre Fraud versus Fyre, streaming on Hulu and Netflix, respectively. At the dawn of 2019, our twin film obsession History: Oscar Wilde versus The Trials of Oscar Wilde in 1960, The Conversation versus The Parallax View in 1974, Armageddon versus Deep Impact in 1998. That a certain theme is resonating deeply with the public. Treatments of the opioid crisis, Ben Is Back and Beautiful Boy -suggests That's either an indication of how clever it is, or a sign that it's more than just borderline ridiculous.Same topic, it’s a banner day for cultural criticism. ![]() Still, only sharp-eyed true crime aficionados will guess the absolutely outlandish ending. With more effective reveals done in far superior films as of late, the pretzel-shaped twists displayed in Winther's surface level ghost story may seem a little predictable. ![]() The film is certainly perfect fodder for the Netflix algorithm. "Aftermath" takes that premise and eventually pays it off with a truly bizarre conclusion that should make the two hour commitment worth it to most couples looking for a mildly frightening suburban mystery. The harassment lasted for months before Rowe was finally discovered and charged with felony stalking. As revealed in an exposé by People, a San Diego couple living in the high-end neighborhood of Carmel Valley was tormented by a woman named Kathy Rowe - a rival buyer who lost out on her bid for the Spanish-style house the couple wound up purchasing. The threatening notes that a well-to-do couple receive over the course of Murphy's show are based on a true story, and the events of "Aftermath" also have a real history behind them. If Ryan Murphy's Netflix series "The Watcher" is coming to mind, that's not a coincidence.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |